HOME > Financial Advisor Education Corner > Educational FYIs

Educational FYIs
These recent developments and case studies address any aspect of the law that touches on estate planning. They offer an interesting perspective and/or warning. The frequency of release varies from month to month and week to week. Our purpose for sharing these Educational FYI's to you is to further enlighten you on the many variables involved in the fine balancing act of proper estate planning.

REGISTER TO VIEW eALERTS ARCHIVE

Collins Law Group releases important estate planning and related articles on a regular basis. Please take a moment to register to receive full access to our Educational Alerts and FYIs.  CLICK TO REGISTER  - OR - Enter the password that was given to you:

Article on Family Caregivers
The Sunday, September 9, 2007 issue of Parade magazine contains an article by Gail Sheehy on family caregiving. It will recount some of her own experiences as a spousal caregiver to her husband.

Power of Attorney, Lacking Gift-Giving Authority, Does Not Authorize Gifts to Agent
Mother, suffering from mild dementia, executed a general power of attorney in favor of her son--the power of attorney did not include any language specifically authorizing gifts.  Shortly thereafter she moved in and lived with him, and after about eight months moved to a nursing home.  At the time of her move to the nursing home the son, using his power of attorney, transferred all her real property, stocks and other assets to himself.  The mother died a little over a year later, leaving a will that devised all her assets equally to her son and daughter.  After securing appointment as executor of the estate, daughter filed suit to recover the remaining assets, arguing that the purpose of the original conveyance was solely to protect the assets from being depleted by nursing home expenses and that with the mother's death they should be reconveyed to her estate.  Trial court ordered reconveyance and on appealed. Intermediate state appellate court affirms, noting that without a specific gift-giving provision in the power of attorney, a gift to the agent "carries with it a presumption of impropriety and self-dealing."  In order to overcome that presumption, the recipient of the gift must make "the clearest showing of intent" on the part of the principal; evidence that the mother in this case trusted her son more, wanted him to manage her money, and may even have been fearful of her daughter did not meet that high standard of evidence.

Post-Nuptial Agreement Does Not Violate Public Policy - Bratton v. Bratton case
A year after his marriage, a medical student hand-wrote and signed a letter indicating that he promised never to be the cause of a divorce, and if he ever did he assigned 50% of his assets and 50% of his future earnings to his wife. Two months later the couple signed a more formal post-nuptial agreement, drafted by an attorney (the parties disputed whether the attorney represented the husband or the wife), which made a similar provision if the husband "was guilty of statutory grounds for divorce."

Spendthrift Trust Not Reachable by Medical Creditors of Now - Deceased Beneficiary - Medical Park Hospital v. Bancorpsouth Bank of Hope case
A father established a testamentary trust for the benefit of his son, which included a spendthrift provision.  The trust gave the trustee discretion to distribute or withhold all income and up to $1,200 per year of principal, and the trust language indicated that the discretion should be exercised "for the comfortable support and maintenance" of his son.  The trustee secured a court order authorizing payment of a fixed amount each month to the son, increasing that amount over several years as his condition declined.

Transfer of Funds to Special Needs Trust Disqualifies Beneficiary from State Supplement Income Payments - Parkhurst v. Wilson-Coker case
After an auto accident injured an already-disabled benefits recipient, his mother successfully sought court approval to establish a special needs trust with the $115,377.56 of net proceeds from a lawsuit.  The trust and its establishment apparently satisfied the Social Security Administration, and his SSI benefits continued to be available.  The State, however, determined that establishment of the trust was a disqualifying transfer for Connecticut's SSI supplement program and terminated his benefits.

Debt of the Elderly and Near-Elderly 1992-2001
American families with a family heads who are age 55 or older had approximately the same level of debt payments relative to income and of debt levels relative to assets in 2001 as they did in 1992, according to a new report by the Employee Benefit Research Institute. In terms of retirement security, the EBRI report noted that, on the whole, the new data are positive that most older families did not appear to be overburdened by debt in 2001. However, there has been an increase in the percentage of heavily indebted families -- defined as those with debt payments exceeding 40 percent of income -- especially for family heads in the two oldest groups (ranging from 5 to 10 percent of all near elderly and elderly families).

Granddaughter Ordered to Return Assets Transferred by Power of Attorney for Medicaid Planning Purposes - In re McCool case
A daughter and granddaughter of elderly woman filed competing petitions for appointment as the woman's guardian. The daughter requested appointment of a temporary guardian, alleging an emergency. At the hearing, the granddaughter acknowledged that she had loaned or transferred over $450,000 to herself using a power of attorney, but alleged that the transfers and purchase of an annuity were for Medicaid planning purposes. When specifically challenged about a $100,000 annuity (on which she had collected a commission on purchase, and naming her children as beneficiaries), the granddaughter characterized her failure to list it as an asset of her grandmother's estate as a "scrivener's error."

Guardianship Court's Determination of Incapacity and Selection of Guardian Upheld - Conservatorship of Grimmett case
An elderly woman moved from her home state to an assisted living center near her granddaughter, who lived in another state. Her granddaughter, who is an attorney, was an agent in the elderly woman's power of attorney. Granddaughter was also named as the sole beneficiary of her estate. Shortly after the move she began to "slip," and when she learned that her granddaughter had expressed concern about her drinking she became more antagonistic. An old drinking friend made contact with the grandmother and began living with her, though not paying any rent or contributing to her expenses, and allegedly increased her alcohol use.

Uniform Trust Code Does Not Permit Termination of Spendthrift Trust - Estate of Somers case
A trust provided for payment of $100 / month each to two grandchildren of trustor, with remainder on their death to go to charity. The trust contained a spendthrift provision preventing the alienation of grandchildren's interests. Nearly fifty years after the trustor's death, the trust corpus had grown to $3.5 million. Grandchildren and remainder beneficiary entered into agreement to terminate trust and to distribute $150,000 to each of the grandchildren and the balance to the remainder beneficiary. The corporate trustee declined to act on the agreement, and charity and grandchildren filed a joint petition to terminate the trust.

Revocation of Power of Attorney Properly Invalidated, But Court's Decision to Strike Will is Premature - Gaddy v. Douglass case
An elderly woman, with the assistance of her long-time attorney, created a will, a charitable trust and a power of attorney naming a personal friend as executor, trustee and agent. Some years later, after significant deepening of dementia and at the instigation of a caretaker who was disgruntled with the agent's refusal to change her to the day shift, the woman visited an attorney selected by her family members and revoked the prior planning documents and executed new documents naming those family members as the agents, trustees and executors.

Attorney Not Liable for Failure to Undo Estate Plan - DiStefano v. Milardo case
Client, a serious alcoholic, utilized the services of an attorney to establish a trust, will and power of attorney. After several institutionalizations, she approached the attorney to undo her plan, and particularly to remove her son as agent, trustee and personal representative. The attorney reminded her that she had established her plan precisely to protect against her own mismanagement, and did not take steps to unravel her planning. A year later (and after another institutionalization for alcoholism and depression), she revoked the trust and power of attorney on her own, and then sued her attorney for malpractice, alleging that his failure to undo her estate plan was the proximate cause of alleged losses from theft by her agent.

---

Share this Page With a Friend or Colleague

Printer-friendly

---